|
A
meeting of art, power and the city
The Globe & Mail, January 2007

by Sarah Milroy
Ambitious show at Toronto’s Power Plant explores
what it feels like to be an artist in the metropolis.
The current show ar the Power Plant in Toronto –
We Can Do This Noew- has an ambitious premise. Responding to the
city’s collective fetish with becoming something bigger and
better, the exhibition says nay to the big builders ( the Art Gallery
of Ontario and the Royal Ontario Museum). Positing this feisty little
show as a kind of starting gun in the race to define the city. We
don’t have to wait for those palaces of art to be completed,
the curators suggest. We can do this now.
The effort, then, is not to be a “best and brightest”
roundup of Toronto art. Instead, as the exhibition’s opening
statement puts it, the organizers want to “explore themes
of contemporary art’s production, presentation and reception.”
That may sound a bit drab, but take heart: The exhibition seems
to be about something more interesting., exploring what it feels
like to be an artist in the city, and the curiously disenfranchised.
Far-from –the footlights and (consequently) free condition
of the practitioners working here. Institutions, and the authority
they wield, are viewed in these works with a kind of looking-through-the-binoculars-backward
type of alienation. Power is something studied from afar.
The show includes work by artists from all generations, but the
eminence grise is clearly Ian Carr-Harris, who is showing two stylized
scale models of museums, the Tate Modern (housed in a converted
power station in London) and the Power Plant, also a converted energy
facility turned gallery. But what kind of power is being referred
to here? Carr-Harris’s museums are white and austere, and
one can enter them only visually, and only partly.
In Tate Modern (Survey), from 2005 you peek through openings in
the façade to see a book splayed open, a small collection
of bound volumes, and an excerpt from Diego Velazquez’s famous
La Meninas, a painting venerated for its reflections on artifice,
and on the relationship between the artist and his royal patron.
Looking in through the windows, we also see empty galleries, with
light spilling across the floors from opened doorways that lead
to places we cannot see.
In The Power Plant (Verge), made in 2002, the empty interior spaces
of the gallery don’t seem to add up, and one is left circling
the model again and again, trying to stitch together a clear understanding
of the interior topography from various vantage points. Is this
how the artists feel about the institutions that show their work,
as if their inner workings are mired in obscurity and contradiction?
You wonder.
One of the young stars of this show is Kristan Horton, one of Toronto’s
most promising artists. (Look for his one-man show at the Art Gallery
of York University this spring.) Horton, who has also worked in
photography and sculpture, is presenting here the first issue of
his mock newsletter Walnut Nuclear Power Station, a journal that
documents the construction of an ad hoc nuclear power facility in
the basement of his downtown Toronto studio. Using his own photographs,
images drawn from google and his own brand of anarchistic humour,
Horton splices together a sequential record of his faux project
in its nascent, excavation stages.
Again, as with Carr-Harris, the theme of power is touched upon –
both its danger and its allure. Cut off from the mainstream economy
and its privileges, the artist is a free radical. He will make his
own power. The idea is delightfully silly, but it suggests an artist
who stands apart, and it places the work in the tradition of the
avant-garde, stretching back to the 19th-century france. Here is
Horton, the ultimate flaneur self-starter.
The strength of the show lies in how it orchestrates a play of ideas
without over-determining our reception of them. Things hang together,
but loosely, and there is a lot of room for creative meaning-making
on the part of the viewer. Thus, we meet Paulette Phillips’s
DVD installation Crosstalk in which a number of artists, critics
and other participants in the Toronto art scene are shown dressed
in business attire, traversing a busy downtown intersection (another
seat of power). These men and women look at the camera as they pass
by, and their emotions: suspicion, curiosity, contempt, ennui. Instead
of the artists being the spectacle, we, the viewers, are given that
role and the alienation and discomfort that go along with it.
Derek Sullivan takes on the notion of Toronto as a hermetic art
community out of touch with the wider world (part of the city’s
bad self-talk), enacting a kind of cultural cross-fertilization
by papering the gallery here and there with posters made by other
artists from outside the city, among them Fiona Banner (U.K.), AA
Bronson (a Canadian in New York) and Jonathan Monk (U.K.), all artists
who have a connection with the city.
Scott Lyall has intervened in the infrastructure of the gallery
by installing a kind of culture lab on the second floor, offering
gallery visitors back issues of important local and international
art periodicals and significant catalogues on Toronto artists for
their use. In addition to serving as a library, the space doubles
as a site for talks and gatherings in which new understandings are
being hammered out. (One Sunday-morning presentation that I attended
involved Horton’s brilliant presentation on the Protestant
Reformation and its allegorical relation to the Toronto art scene,
sweetened by bloody martys, surely a high point in Toronto museum
programming.) the gallery as showcase for commodity is transformed
into a platform for debate and education.
The mascot piece for the show, though, is Luis Jacob’s installation
of a flock of taxidermied pigeons in flight titled From Stream to
Golden Stream. The title riffs on the Power Plant’s inaugural
1987 exhibition From Sea to Shining Sea, which told the story of
the alternative culture of artist-run centres and publications in
Canada, but Jacob saucily and irreverently re-sexes it gay through
the allusion to unorthodox sexual practices of the golden shower
persuasion.
In addition to making reference to Toronto’s exhibition history,
Jacob’s installation also responds to the city’s most
famous work of public art, Michael Snow’s Flight Stop, at
the Eaton Centre. Snow’s piece was made in 1979, and it still
feels emblematic of a bold moment in the city’s growth.
But in Jacob’s wonderfully ironic reprise, Snow’s heroic
flock of Canada geese (aloft in their glass vaulted cathedral to
consumerism), are re-imagined as a scruffy bunch of pigeons. The
message is clear. The energy is out there, on the street. Here is
a show that brings it inside the museum, and out of the cold.
|